You really see what I see?

We all see one color of each banana?Dr. FFF in study of human color

These changes are edited for clarification.

Your weekly weekly memory, Dr.Welcome to weekly weekly study of FF Wilson.

We all agree that this rose is red, if I call it red, you call it red, but how can I know you see it blue, but you just taught it to call it red.

I suspect that we all have this conversation at some point in our lives, a rule of late nights, complemented by a variety of changes in various types or others.We will not become the first person.The experiment considered "reverse spectrum" appears in John Locke's waters, which means that this incredible to fall into the waters in the waters, the incredible philosophy:

If we look at different colors, very wonderful scientists can show our mind and actually check what we understand.

Yes they are.

We have never had a new update in the new human brain neuroscience.It is not too difficult to produce information from the human brain.Suggest that it activates.

ARTIFICIAL intelligence tools have started because you can search for a large device algorithm."

Some interesting features in mind are due to this type of investigation.A study taught a sample of artificial intelligence for Africa while podcast and other sounds are heard.Then they thought people think of different thoughts and is able to do them to be offered them alone.He just had the reading of this person's thoughts just worked.The use of model that is taught to your brain causing rebellion.

And what forces to think of the nature of the subject of subjective experiences that my entire inner world is different from reality?It is so much of reality, do you see that the only one, even if you see them the same thing?

Enter in this study, "Retinotopic functional architecture has a large number of prejudiced areas and the human brain is shared," appears in the Journal of Neuro Science.

The title is the heart, you read here, but when I read the newspapers this week, I can share human brains.Will I possibly answer the questions of text spectrus?

This is how the study is working.

15 participants with normal color vision have been included in the FMRI scanner.The first step was to map their visual cortex.

This is a bit funky appearance as the body area, which requires a lot of processing power (such as hands), is larger than the rest, but basically because the hands are close to the shoulders.

Researchers separated the visual cortex by showing the participants black and white mesh to see which parts of the brain are lit.

We are all similar here.But there are differences in peopleWhen the brain surveyAfter that, they recommend from the new signal.

News?Different.Learth displays the rings of red, green or yellow in the scantex.

They started with an easy question.If you would sign the color in someone, can you say what color they see in a blind exam?In other words, they decide that I am red in this special place of my visual trachea;Can they predict if I see by just looking at my personal brain power pattern?

And the answer here is not surprising.At least they can do better than an accident.Remember that there are three possible colors, depending on the brain area. There were significantly more than it was.

That's very good, but it does not really answer the question of the question.To reach it, you should see if you can predict the color of the previous data as a guide.

And that's what he did.Using a model trained on all participants except a person, he made predictions about what color he was looking at the person of interest.So, here, the possibility here would be 33%accurate.

Surprisingly, surprisingly, the researchers discovered that they could predict that someone else could see, at least becoming better than the opportunity.

This indicates that the understanding of color is very similar to all brain.

First why?Why should we all look red in the same minority of our visual cortex?In fact, this study cannot tell us.The authors suspect that there is evolution pressure that promotes all of us against this arrangement or may have some new properties of the connected brain to be accurate for color detection.

But then there's a big question.We all agree that the rose is red.And now, when we see that rose, we all know that activating a similar part of our brain to make sure it is "red."So, what is this?Do we all look red?

And the answer is.Maybe we came across the edge of the philosophical concept of physics.Is it a subjective experience, "redness" of a red, purely defined synpsion that is activated when exposed to a red stimulus?- The forecasts were not perfect.Remember, however, that they were not perfect when the model was tested on the same brain on which it was trained, indicating that it is a distinction between our measurements, not its own differences in the brain that lead to lack of perfect prediction.

But there is always doubt here, because none of us can really be in another's brain.Non -scientists, big, sinful shooting are the same, but nothing about the personal experience of the sinful shooting.

To me, he feels the final description of the anti -finalization.I am not saying this unrealistic;If the problem is not really experimenting with, it loses my meaning.It will definitely be fun.I enjoyed ining the experience of a different world to him.If I don't know if such a world is on someone else's mind, I should probably not spend more.

Thank you for traveling before 7 p.m.3 at a hostel in college.You can just make a lot of wagons with wagons next time.

F. Perry Wilson, MD, MD, Med, Medicine and Media for the State of the Yale Assembly and Nukininand.wen is no, there is no, there is now available.