Oct 14, 2025
3 min read
Prerequisition Scientists do not want Collegty AI's academic scientists.
Scientists are a mass of doubt - they are the meaning of the work.
In a preview of its 2025 report on the impact of the tech on research, the academic publisher Wiley released preliminary findings on attitudes toward AI. One startling takeaway: the report found that scientists expressed less trust in AI than they did in 2024, when it was decidedly less advanced.
For example, in 2024 to test 51 percent of scientists concern about "the percentage of the researchers from 45 to 62.
The danger of security and privacy was 11 percent higher than last year, while athlie also offered AI and transparency.
In addition, there is a sharp drop in hype compared to the beginning of the previous year of 2025.
These findings followed previous investigations that concluded that the more people learned about the operation of AI, the less they trusted, the contrary was also true: The greater fanboys of the AI tended to be the least that understand the least technology.
More research is needed to show how widespread this phenomenon is, but it's not hard to guess why experts are starting to have doubts about algorithmic assistants.
On the one hand, these hallucinations are a serious problem. They have caused huge disorders in courts, medical practice and even travel. It is also not exactly a simple solution;Testing in May showed that even when AI models became more technically powerful, they produced several hallucinations.
It is also a complex issue of AI as a tool for profit.Experts say that users prefer secret LLMs for those who agree when they can't access data or give the right answer - even when the information is completely created.
Therefore, if you are not sure whether to ask the investigator a question, please let him/her know.The researcher will be happy to answer your questions.
More than Issued: and the cotboats have more than a larger than the main list
