Mar 24, 2026
3 min read
The CEO said artistic control rests with the designer.
Jensen Huang says gamers are 'completely wrong' about DLSS 5 - Nvidia CEO reacts to DLSS 5 backlash
The CEO says artistic control rests with the developers.
Get the best news and in-depth reviews from Tom's Hardware delivered straight to your inbox.
You are now registered
Your newsletter registration has been successful
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang criticizes DLSS 5 in printed Q&A with Tom's Hardware at GTC 2026 The company's new use of artificial intelligence and neural rendering to predict how certain aspects of games will look is critical of DLSS 5.
Since the feature first appeared, some critics have complained on social media that the technology makes games look worse, homogenized, or just shows Nvidia's world view.Much of the criticism focused on Grace Ashcroft and Leon Kennedy's final appearances in Resident Evil Requiem.
"Since DLSS 5 was unveiled yesterday, there has been some talk from some in the gaming community that the technology seems to make games look more generic, similar, or simply reflects NVIDIA's view of how games should look. How do you feel about that criticism?"asked Tom's Hardware editor-in-chief Paul Alcorn.
"First of all, they are completely wrong," replied Huang. "The reason is that As I explained in detail, DLSS 5 combines the power of controlling the geometry and texture of everything about games and creative AI," continued Huang.
He added that while developers can still "improve the AI generation" to suit their style, DLSS 5 adds generation capabilities to existing game geometry, but "doesn't change the art control."
"It's not post-processing, it's not frame-level post-processing, it's geometry-level generative control," he said.
Huang also said that developers can try out the tool and see how they want to use it, suggesting that a developer should try creating a "toon shader" or see if the game should be "out of glass."
"It's all under the direct control of the game developers," he said.It is very different from general AI;It is an innovative way of managing content.That's why we call it neuroimaging."
We'll see if voice actors who don't like what they see change their minds the more we see.DLSS 5 is set to launch this fall, and there will be many more demos of this fully baked technology before then.
3/19/2026 4:38pm PT Update: Added all questions to Jensen.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News or add us as a favorite source to receive our latest news, analysis and reviews in your feed.
Get Tom's best hardware news and in-depth reviews straight to your inbox.
Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware specializing in laptops, desktops and games.They also keep up with the latest news.A lover of all things gaming and technology, his previous work has been featured in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others.Follow him on Thread @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net.You can send tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01
- Paul Alcorn Hair Editor
SkyBill40 "Well, first of all, they're completely wrong," Huang said in a Q&A session in response to a question from Tom's Hardware CEO Paul Alcorn about the criticism.
Why are we wrong?Because you say that?AI may be the answer to lining your pockets with money, but it's not all/everything you think it is, Jensen.On the contrary, it would seem that the push for any kind of AI has made things worse.-
JTWrenn They really got it wrong in the games they chose to show it.The fact that they look too similar to generic gen AI makes it seem like it's all going to look like AI negligence.Now that may or may not be the case...we just haven't seen enough to know.Answer
To use this technology they had to develop an entire game that didn't look like gen-ai but was very high fidelity... and then show that it could be slapped onto something that already existed.
Really bad understanding of how people see Gen Ai now.-
DS426 game developers don't have to choose which upscalers and frame gen technology to implement -- it's an added burden when they spend that time optimizing games and/or adding other content.It also penalizes players who don't choose the right GPU vendor. Give an answer
All three should come together and integrate all of them into an open source SDK.To facilitate healthy competition, hardware vendors optimize some code for their platforms and/or add their own extensions to the SDK.
I don't care about buying a higher GPU or the next technology - I just want to play games that are not won by my choice of GPU, just like many other gamers out there.-
Haha, IKR!SkyBill40 said: "Well, first of all, they're dead," Huang said in a chat-and-answer to questions from Tom's Hardware editor-in-chief Paul Alcorn about the review.
Why are we wrong?Why do you say?AI may be the answer to lining your pockets with money, but it's not the end/all you think, Jensen.On the contrary, it seems that suppressing the AI in any way makes things worse.
Instead of the PSUpower attack technology, which is still in the experimental stage, PC gamers should be more patient, especially since Nvidia is the only company that promotes innovation in 3D graphics.
